More women moving up in world’s top companies

DUBAI: The numbers are moving in the right direction: In eight out of the last 10 years, the share of women becoming CEOs of the world’s biggest public companies has been higher than the share of women leaving that office. And, over the past five years, the total share of women becoming CEOs was considerably higher than in the prior five-year period (3.6 percent versus 2.1 percent).

But despite the upward trend, the numbers are low and wobbly: women made up just 3 percent of new big-company CEOs in 2013, a 1.3 percentage point drop from 2012.

That’s according to Strategy&’s (formerly Booz & Company’s) 14th annual Chief Executive Study, which examines CEO turnover — incoming and outgoing CEOs — at the world’s 2,500 largest public companies. The current study looks at women CEOs over the past 10 years as well as overall succession trends with a focus on 2013’s incoming class of CEOs.

The study authors do expect a bit more progress over the next quarter of a century. “As much as a third of the incoming class of CEOs will be women by 2040, based on a 10-year trend in our data, ever higher education of women, continuing entry of women into the business workforce and changing social norms around the world,” said study co-author Ken Favaro, a Strategy& senior partner.

“We see a similar trend also in the Middle East with an increasing amount of women as CEOs or in other senior leadership positions, not least in family-owned businesses that constitute an important part of these economies,” added study co-author Per-Ola Karlsson, a Strategy& senior partner and Managing Director of the Dubai office.

The study has consistently found that boards most often elevate “insiders”—i.e., people who are currently with the company. In fact, 78 percent of men who became CEOs between 2004 and 2013 were insiders against 22 percent outsiders. But only 65 percent of women who became CEOs in the same period were insiders against 35 percent outsiders.

“That women CEOs are more often outsiders may be an indication that companies have not been able to cultivate enough female executives in-house. So when boards look for new CEOs, they necessarily find a larger pool of female candidates outside their own organizations,” said study co-author Gary L. Nielson, a Strategy& senior partner.

“Our research shows that on the whole, insider CEOs generate higher returns over their tenures than outsider CEOs, so companies seeking to hire women may benefit from looking inside more often than they do today,” said Karlsson.

It’s also notable that women CEOs are more often forced out of their jobs — as opposed to leaving in a planned succession or via a merger — than men CEOs. Over the past 10 years, 38 percentof women CEOs who left their positions were forced out, versus 27 percent of men CEOs.

The study found that in most other aspects, incoming men CEOs and women CEOs have similar profiles: CEOs of both genders rarely come from a region outside of the company headquarters region; they’re more likely to come from line, rather than staff, roles; they became CEO in their early 50s; and they have a tenure of about five years.

Among other notable findings about women and the CEO slot:

The industry with the lowest share (0.8 percent) of women CEOs between 2004 and 2013 was the materials industry.

The countries with the highest share of women CEOs between 2004 and 2013 were the US and Canada (3.2 percent). The country with the lowest percentage (0.8 percent) was Japan.

About the 2013 Chief Executive Study

For 14 years, Strategy& has examined CEO turnover and the incoming class of CEOs at the world’s largest 2,500 public companies, because determining what happens at critical decision points can help us understand what companies are looking for in their CEO and how the role is changing. Along with overall succession trends, this year’s study looks at 2013’s incoming class of CEOs, and also focuses on women CEOs over the last 10 years. This study defines the world’s 2,500 largest public companies by their market capitalization as of January 1, 2013, according to Bloomberg.  Each company that appeared to have changed its CEO was investigated for confirmation that a change occurred in 2013, and additional details were sought for both the outgoing and incoming CEOs.

Strategy& is a global team of practical strategists committed to helping you seize essential advantage.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *