Court frames bribery charges against Jindal in coal case


Naveen JindalNew Delhi : A special court here on Thursday framed an additional charge of abetment to bribery against industrialist and senior Congress leader Naveen Jindal and others in a coal block allocation case.

The court was hearing the case on the allocation of Jharkhand’s Amarkonda Murgadangal coal block to Jindal Steel and Gagan Sponge.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Special Judge Bharat Parashar formally framed the charges against the accused.

After the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial, the court listed the matter for August 31 for further hearing.

The court will formally frame charges against former Jharkhand Chief Minister Madhu Koda on August 31 as he was not present in the court on Thursday.

On April 29, 2016, the court had ordered framing of charges against the former MP and others under various sections — criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, cheating and criminal misconduct. But it had not included bribery charges.

Later, Jindal Steel’s then advisor Anand Goel, Nihar Stocks Ltd Director BSN Suryanarayan and Mumbai’s Essar Power Ltd Executive Vice-Chairman Sushil Kumar Maroo, JSPL’s Deputy Manager (Finance) Siddharth Madra and Deputy General Manager Rajeev Aggarwal were chargesheeted as accused in a supplementary chargesheet.

The court also ordered framing of charges under criminal conspiracy against Goel, Suryanarayan and Maroo. However, it has discharged Madra and Rajeev Aggarwal.

The CBI has alleged that the five were actively involved in the transfer of Rs 2 crore from Jindal Realty, New Delhi Exim, to a company controlled by former Minister of State for Coal Dasari Narayana Rao, in lieu of favour in the allotment of Jharkhand’s coal block to Jindal Steel and Gagan Sponge.

In April 2015, the CBI named Rao, Koda, former Coal Secretary H.C. Gupta, Jindal Realty Director Rajeev Jain, Gagan Sponge Directors Girish Kumar Juneja and R.K. Saraf and Sowbhagya Media’s Managing Director K. Ramakrishna as accused in the case.

Of the five private companies named in the chargesheet, four are based in Delhi and one in Hyderabad.

The accused have denied the charges.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About us

At we intend to introduce and promote the businesses in the Minorities especially Muslim world who distinguish themselves with respect to Halaal and Haraam. From its very beginning this journal/website has convinced Muslim industrialists and businessmen to strengthen the Indian economy and make their relationships more flourishing with other corporate.




Maeeshat Media Pvt Ltd and is not responsible for views and claims expressed by contributors and for reports sourced by other media networks and news agencies. They do not necessarily represent or reflect the editorial policy of the publication.