Can IT companies stand up to government on date security?

Can IT companies stand up to government on date security?

data securityBy Hardev Sanotra Las Vegas (US), (IANS) Can other technology companies defy the government the way Apple did when asked to help US federal investigators to crack the code of iPhone 5C?

Unlikely. Especially in jurisdictions where the governments may not be so benign in pursuing hidden material in electronic devices or data centres.

Not EMC Corporation, the world’s largest data storage multinational.

“We must comply with any sovereign demand in any jurisdiction that we work in,” said David Webster, President and Senior VP, Asia, Pacific and Japan of EMC, when asked how the company would react to demand for data, especially where they are offering cloud storage facilities.

EMC supplies cloud computing hardware and software to data companies and others through its subsidiary VirtuStream, which it acquired in 2015. It offers infrastructure as a service to governments and private companies. It provides protection to data through encryption which is not easy to break.

Webster said their high level of protection assures the data integrity of material sent by clients to cloud centres, but those who want to be extra cautious can set up such centres in different jurisdiction. He was talking to the media at the EMC World annual conference here.

According to Matt Waxman, Vice President of Product Management, Data Protection and Availability Division of EMC, integrity of data was very important to the company and it had put in place both software and hardware based protections.

The question of sovereign demands on data generally had not arisen because it supplies hardware and software for cloud computing which typically are managed by their clients. The responsibility would the clients, he said.

But he agreed that EMC would be liable to provide data in its own cloud computing centres if governments demanded. That was true for the US, Europe or China. “That is something the legal department would have to grapple with,” he told IANS in an interview.

Dell and EMC announced their $67 billion merger in October last year, the largest such action by tech companies in history.

Earlier this week, Michael Dell, Chairman and CEO of the larger company, said at a Las Vegas conference that the merged entity would be called Dell Technologies. The enterprise company, though, would be called Dell-EMC.

Dell is a $58 billion company taken private two years ago. The $25 billion EMC will change its status from a corporation to a private company before the merger, expected to be finalised between June and October this year.

The merger is awaiting final approval from US and Chinese regulators.

The question on security of data arose after US authorities took Apple, the computer and mobile phone giant, to court for refusing to give them access to encrypted material in an iPhone that they had confiscated from two shooters in San Bernardino last December.

The married couple were killed in a police shootout after the two had killed 14 people.

Apple said it could not comply with the court order and had expected to take the battle to the US Supreme Court. But the Federal Bureau of Investigation chose to hire a tech firm to break the Apple 5c encryption paying them over a million dollars. The case was then withdrawn by the FBI.

But the question of sovereign jurisdiction over data was left hanging.

(Hardev Sanotra is in Las Vegas at the invitation of EMC. He can be contacted at hardev.sanotra@ians.in)

Can IT companies stand up to government on date security?

Now, Facebook, Google and WhatsApp to fortify user data security

data securityLondon : (IANS) As Apple battles the US government over encryption to unlock an iPhone used by an attacker in a mass shooting in San Bernadino last year, top US companies Google, Facebook and Snapchat are expanding encryption of user data in their services, media reported.

According to The Guardian, while Whatsapp is set to roll out encryption for its voice calls in addition to its existing privacy features, Google is investigating “extra uses” for encryption in secure email.

Social networking giant Facebook too is working on to better protect its Messenger service.

The popular messaging service Snapchat is also considering a more secure messaging system.

Apple, which is expected to appear in a federal court in California on March 22 to fight the order, has accused the US Department of Justice (DoJ) of trying to “smear” the company with “desperate” and “unsubstantiated” claims.

It followed the Justice Department’s latest court filing over its demand that Apple create software to unlock an iPhone used by an attacker in a mass shooting last year, BBC reported.

The department said that Apple’s stance was “corrosive” of institutions trying to protect “liberty and rights”.

It also claims Apple helped the Chinese government with iPhone security.

Apple’s general counsel Bruce Sewell said: “The tone of the brief reads like an indictment.”

He said: “Everybody should beware because it seems like disagreeing with the Department of Justice means you must be evil and anti-American, nothing could be further from the truth.”

Prosecutors claim Apple’s own data shows that China demanded information from Apple regarding more than 4,000 iPhones in the first half of 2015, and Apple produced data 74 percent of the time.

But Sewell said the new filing relies on thinly sourced reports to inaccurately suggest that Apple had colluded with the Chinese government to undermine iPhone buyers’ security.

The US government has been fighting Apple over access to information on the iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino killers, Rizwan Farook, in December. Apple says the demands violate the company’s rights.

The Department of Justice claimed in its court filing that Apple had attacked the FBI investigation as “shoddy”, and tried to portray itself as a “guardian of Americans’ privacy”.

This “rhetoric is not only false, but also corrosive of the very institutions that are best able to safeguard our liberty and our rights: The courts, the Fourth Amendment, longstanding precedent and venerable laws, and the democratically elected branches of government,” the DoJ said.

In February, the FBI obtained a court order to force Apple to write new software that would allow the government to break into the phone. The FBI wants the software to bypass auto-erase functions on the phone.

Apple has argued that the government is asking for a “back door” that could be exploited by the government and criminals.