Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
India Remains Host and Source of Most Hindu Migrants; GCC Nations, USA Emerge as Key Emigration Hubs: Study

India Remains Host and Source of Most Hindu Migrants; GCC Nations, USA Emerge as Key Emigration Hubs: Study

The study also sheds light on the migration patterns of other religious groups in India, highlighting the country as a case where migrants are disproportionately drawn from religious minorities.

NEW DELHI – A study by US-based think tank Pew Research Center has revealed India as the leading source of Hindu migrants, with 7.6 million Hindus born in the country currently living abroad. The report also noted that India is the second-most common country of origin for Muslim migrants, with 6 million Muslims living abroad.

Pew Research’s latest report, titled ‘Religious Composition of the World’s Migrants’, highlights key trends and shifts in the global migration patterns of Hindus, among other religions, The New Indian Express Reported.

As of 2020, Hindus make up 5% of all international migrants, totaling 13 million. This percentage is notably lower compared to their 15% share of the global population, indicating their under-representation among global migrants, Pew’s study suggests.

The study also found that Hindu migrants tend to travel longer distances compared to other groups, averaging 3,100 miles from their country of origin, which is significantly more than the global average of 2,200 miles.

While the Asia-Pacific region (APAC) was the primary destination in the past, the Middle East, North Africa, and North America have seen significant increases in Hindu migrant populations.

The report suggests that Hindus are far more likely to have left Bangladesh and Pakistan than they are to have left India or Nepal.

“Hindus form a small minority of the overall population in Bangladesh (8%) and Pakistan (2%), but they make up 21% and 8% of international migrants from those countries, respectively. On the other hand, Hindus form large majorities in India (79%) and Nepal (81%), but they make up only 41% and 56%, respectively, of migrants leaving those places,” it says.

Disproportionate migration among other religions

The study also sheds light on the migration patterns of other religious groups in India, highlighting the country as a case where migrants are disproportionately drawn from religious minorities.

Hindus, despite being the majority religion in India, are less likely to emigrate compared to other groups. Specifically, only 41% of Indians who migrated abroad in 2020 were Hindus.

This percentage is significantly lower than the Hindu share of India’s population, indicating that Hindus have a lower propensity to migrate internationally compared to their demographic weight in India.

In contrast, Muslims and Christians show higher migration rates.

The study reports that 33% of Indians who emigrated in 2020 were Muslims, and 16% were Christians. These figures are higher than their respective shares of the overall Indian population (Muslims 14.2% and Christians 2.3% based on the 2011 Census), reflecting a greater tendency among these communities to seek opportunities outside India.

The study highlighted that Muslims are significantly more likely to emigrate compared to the Hindu majority in India. Most of these Muslim migrants settle in Muslim-majority countries with job opportunities, including the UAE (1.8 million), Saudi Arabia (1.3 million), and Oman (720,000).

Hindu Migration to India

The report highlights that Hindus constitute 61% of the migrant population residing in India. This figure is notably high, reflecting the fact that Hindus make up approximately 79% of India’s total population.

The high percentage of Hindu migrants in India underscores the country’s role as a major destination for Hindus who have migrated, largely due to historical events such as the partition and subsequent regional shifts.

Origin and Major Destinations

According to Pew Research, the majority of these migrants originate from APAC, particularly India, which remains the largest source of Hindu migrants, with 7.6 million individuals.

Bangladesh follows as the second-largest source, contributing 1.6 million Hindu migrants, while Nepal is the third-largest source, with 1.5 million. Pakistan provides approximately 940,000 Hindu migrants.

In terms of destinations, India remains a major hub, hosting 22% of Hindu migrants, equivalent to 3 million individuals.

The study, referencing the mass migrations following the 1947 partition and the 1971 Bangladesh independence war, notes that many Hindus from what became Pakistan and Bangladesh moved to India, while many Muslims from India relocated to Pakistan or Bangladesh.

“For decades after that, the number of Hindu migrants living in India remained high, though it has been declining recently as the generation of Hindus who moved during Partition gradually dies,” the study noted.

Apart from India, the United States is the second-largest destination, accommodating 2.6 million Hindu migrants.

Additionally, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia are significant destinations for Hindu migrants, where they are often temporary workers, though many routinely renew their work permits.

The only countries aside from India in which Hindus are the largest group of migrants are Nepal and Bhutan. However, these countries have relatively small populations overall, and they are not among the top destinations for Hindu migrants.

Regional Distribution

According to Pew Research, the Asia-Pacific region remains the most significant destination for Hindu migrants, with 44% of them residing there.

This region is followed by the Middle East and North Africa, which hosts 24% of Hindu migrants. North America is the third-largest destination, accommodating 22% of the Hindu migrant population.

In contrast, Europe hosts about 8% of Hindu migrants, while Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa have very few Hindu migrants.

Migration Routes

The research highlights several prominent migration routes for Hindus.

The most common route is from India to the United States, with 1.8 million Hindus making this journey. Another significant route is from Bangladesh to India, where nearly 1.6 million Hindus have migrated.

Additionally, there is substantial movement from India to Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, with approximately 3 million Hindus residing in this region, where foreign workers make up half or more of the area’s workforce.

The long distances and high numbers of Hindu migrants in countries like the US and GCC nations suggest that economic opportunities, rather than crises or conflicts, largely drive Hindu migration.

Changes Since 1990

There has been a shift in Hindu migration patterns since 1990.

As per the report, the total number of Hindu migrants globally increased from 9.1 million in 1990 to 13.5 million in 2020, reflecting a 48% rise. However, this growth rate is slower compared to the overall increase in global migrants, which grew by 83% during the same period.

Regional patterns have shifted notably, with a decline in Hindu migrants residing in the APAC from 80% in 1990 to less than half by 2020.

“In 1990, nearly eight-in-ten Hindu immigrants lived in the Asia-Pacific region. By 2020, that share had dropped to less than half. This change is partly because many migrants who moved during Partition had died by 2020. Three decades earlier, about 4 million Hindus who had been born in Pakistan or Bangladesh were residing in India. By 2020, the number had roughly halved, to 2.1 million,” the study suggested.

Conversely, the number of Hindu migrants in the Middle East-North Africa region has surged from 0.7 million to 3.3 million, due to several emigrants moving to GCC countries for work.

Among the GCC nations, Qatar saw the most Hindu migrants, from 1,000 in 1990 to 290,000 in 2020, while the UAE recorded the steepest increase of Hindu migrants, growing from 140,000 to 1.1 million during this timespan.

Meanwhile, North America saw an increase from 0.8 million to 3.0 million during this period, due to a rise in the number of Indian-born Hindus living in the US.

Similarly, the number of Hindu migrants in Malaysia has risen 15 times, from 30,000 to 470,000, driven primarily by migrant workers from Nepal who arrived in search of jobs. In 2020, Malaysia was the seventh-largest destination for Hindu migrants.

MGNREGA Living Monument’ of PM Modi’s Betrayal of Rural India: Kharge

MGNREGA Living Monument’ of PM Modi’s Betrayal of Rural India: Kharge

NEW DELHI – Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Friday slammed the Centre over its handling of the MGNREGA, alleging that the present state of the scheme is “a living monument of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “betrayal” of rural India.

Kharge recalled that in 2005, on this day, the then Congress-led UPA government enacted the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) to ensure ‘Right to Work’ to crores of people in rural India, PTI reported.

In a post on X, he said at present, there are 13.3 crore active workers who depend on the MGNREGA, despite low wages, abysmal work-days, and facing deletion of job cards.

Lucknow: Zomato’s Muslim Worker Assaulted for Delay in Delivering Order

Lucknow: Zomato’s Muslim Worker Assaulted for Delay in Delivering Order

LUCKNOW – A Zomato delivery boy was subjected to a violent attack in the Gomti Nagar area of the city on the night of the Raksha Bandhan festival last week. The incident occurred after the delivery of 20 rotis was delayed, leading to a brutal assault by four individuals who targeted the delivery worker because of his Muslim identity.

The delivery boy, Mohammad Aslam of Maulviganj in Aminabad, received an order for 20 rotis. He informed the customer of a slight delay, explaining that he had two prior orders to complete. The customer initially requested the cancellation of the order but later disconnected the call, saying that they would wait.

Upon reaching Vinit Khand in Gomti Nagar to deliver the rotis, Aslam was called up to the customer’s residence. As he approached, he was pulled inside by a young man. Once inside, the four individuals in the house saw Aslam’s name on the Zomato app and inquired about his religion.

Aslam confirmed that he was Muslim, prompting the group to violently attack him. The attackers beat Aslam and then threw alcohol on him. They restrained him by tying his hands and feet before he managed to escape and report the incident to the Gomti Nagar police station.

Inspector Rajesh Kumar Tripathi of the Gomti Nagar Police Station confirmed that a case has been registered in connection with the assault. “We have started an investigation into the matter. Action will be taken based on the facts that come to light,” Tripathi stated.

Aslam’s account of the incident highlights a disturbing pattern of discrimination and violence against Muslim delivery workers. Such attacks have been reported before, often triggered by the delivery worker’s name or religious identity. In some cases, delivery workers have faced harassment or been denied orders solely because of their religion.

The incident has sparked outrage and calls for greater protection for delivery workers from such acts of violence and discrimination. Advocates for minority rights have condemned the attack and urged authorities to ensure that justice is served.

Aslam’s experience underscores the ongoing challenges faced by individuals in the service industry, particularly those from minority communities, who continue to face prejudice and hostility.

Media bodies slam Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma for targeting scribe’s religious identity

Media bodies slam Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma for targeting scribe’s religious identity

Media bodies in Assam slammed Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Thursday, for allegedly targeting a journalist’s religious identity in response to his question on flattening hills in the State.

During the Chief Minister’s interaction with journalists on August 21, reporter Shah Alam, a Muslim, sought to know the status of action against hill-cutting in a part of Assam. In videos of the interaction, the CM can then be heard asking Mr. Alam’s name and associating him with a Muslim-owned university of Meghalaya accused of flattening hills to cause floods in Assam.

“Instead of answering the question put forth by a local journalist, the Chief Minister referred to his religious identity to make a trivial remark,” Samim Sultana Ahmed and Dhanjit Kumar Das, the president and general secretary of the Journalists’ Union of Assam, said in a statement on Thursday.

‘Personal attack’

“A personal attack on a journalist based on his religion is not expected from a Chief Minister, who also undermined the right of journalists to ask questions,” they said, urging Dr. Sarma to abstain from making such comments.

The Gauhati Press Club also expressed concern over the increasing instances of disparaging responses by political leaders when journalists ask them questions, as part of their job, during media interactions.

“In the latest case, the Chief Minister pulled the religious identity of a journalist into context without any apparent relevance… We urge all political leaders to ensure no recurrence of such instances in the future, and show dignity to their position as well as the role of media,” Sushmita Goswami and Sanjoy Ray, the press club’s president and general secretary, said in a statement.

The Journalist Association For Assam’s president Abhideep Choudhury, working president Pankaj Deka, chief organising secretary Kushal Saikia, and secretary general Kunja Mohan Roy issued a similar statement, saying that bringing a journalist’s religious or ethnic identity into an issue “can never be acceptable”.

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh also slammed Dr. Sarma’s comments. “What the Assam CM said is unacceptable and condemnable. A sick mind and a loud mouth are a toxic combination,” he said in a post on X. ( With PTI Inputs )

NDA govt attempting to undermine country’s secular fabric: Tejashwi on Waqf bill

NDA govt attempting to undermine country’s secular fabric: Tejashwi on Waqf bill

PATNA : The Leader of the Opposition in the Bihar Assembly, Tejashwi Yadav, criticised the proposed Waqf Amendment Bill, accusing the NDA government of attempting to undermine the country’s secular fabric and incite religious tensions.

Yadav made these remarks following a meeting with a delegation of various Muslim organisations at his residence on Friday.

“We strongly oppose this unconstitutional and unnecessary amendment bill proposed by the NDA government. It was brought with the aim of breaking the secular fabric of the country and spreading religious frenzy,” Yadav said.

His comments reflect a significant political opposition to the bill, which is seen by some as a move that could potentially disturb communal harmony in India.

Highlighting his party’s longstanding commitment to minority rights, Tejashwi Yadav said that both his party and its national president, Lalu Prasad Yadav, have consistently been sensitive to the issues concerning minorities and are firmly against any government interference in religious matters.

“The proposed amendments would negatively impact not only the religious, cultural, and property rights of Muslims but also those of other religious communities, thereby setting a dangerous precedent,” he said.

Tejashwi Yadav reassured the delegation of Muslim organisations that he and his party stand firmly with them in opposing the bill. He also criticised Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar for supporting the proposed amendments, stating, “We will not let it pass from Parliament at any cost and will fight this battle on all forums. It is unfortunate that Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar is in support of this bill.”

The Waqf Amendment Bill, introduced during the budget session of the Parliament, proposes several significant changes, including allowing a non-Muslim chief executive officer and at least two non-Muslim members to be appointed by the state government to the Waqf boards at the state level. Additionally, the bill proposes to give the District Collector the authority to decide whether a property is classified as Waqf property or government land.