Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
MLK’s or MTG’s Vision: Which Path for America’s Democracy?

MLK’s or MTG’s Vision: Which Path for America’s Democracy?

Frank F. Islam

Frank F. Islam

The Senate impeachment trial is over. As expected, former President Donald Trump was not found guilty.

Now, the real trial begins. That is the trial for the United States of America and this democratic republic.

Our American democracy is at a crossroads. The path we choose to follow will determine the future of that democracy and whether it has one.

In speaking out for human and civil rights more than one-half a century ago, Martin Luther King, Jr. (MLK) said:

This will be the day when we shall bring into full realization the dream of American democracy — a dream yet unfulfilled. A dream of equality of opportunity, of privilege and property widely distributed; a dream of a land where men will not take necessities from the many to give luxuries to the few.

MLK charted a course to move this democracy forward.

In speaking out for gun rights and conspiracy theories over the past few years, Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) (R-Ga) has said numerous things. MTG:

  • Called the shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, FL a “false flag” event. And in March 2019 confronted David Hogg, a survivor of that shooting and gun control advocate, outside the U.S. Capitol, accusing him of “trying to take away my Second Amendment rights.”

MTG is charting a course to move this democracy backward.

MTG has been called out by some in the leadership of the Republican Party for her harmful rhetoric which has included vilifying Blacks, Muslims and Jews:

  • During MTG’s election campaign, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La) stated forcefully, “The comments made by Ms. Greene are disgusting and don’t reflect the values of equality and decency that make our country great.”

In spite of McCarthy’s statement, the House Republican conference did nothing formally to reprimand MTG for her unseemly behavior. As a result, on February 4, the full House voted 230 to 199, with 11 Republicans joining 219 Democrats, to take Greene off the Committees to which she had been assigned.

During the House hearing, MTG recanted some of her more outrageous QAnon-related statements, issued a semi-apology, and stated “I was allowed to believe things that weren’t true.” Many of the Republicans in the House gave her a standing ovation at the conclusion of her “courageous confession” in which she assumed no personal responsibility for her actions.

After her command performance in the House chambers, MTG went off script, spoke for herself, and told the truth. She tweeted out on February 5, “I woke up early this morning literally laughing thinking about what a bunch of morons the Democrats (+11) are for giving someone like me free time.” In a press conference on that same day, MTG proclaimed, of Donald Trump, “The party is his. It doesn’t belong to anyone else.”

MTG might say the Republican Party belongs to Trump but it does not belong to him alone. It also belongs to mirror images of Trump like MTG.

That is the point that Michelle Goldberg makes in an article published in the New York Times titled “It’s Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Party Now,” and Molly Jong-Fast makes, in her Vogue article titled “Marjorie Taylor Greene Is No Outlier. She Is Now the Face of the Republican Party.”

If MTG is the Republican Party and its face, the vision for its path to the future is exclusionary, inequitable, and regressive. In stark contrast, the MLK vision for the path to the future is inclusionary, equitable, and progressive.

There is one other significant difference in the paths espoused by MLK and MTG. One path embraces and advocates nonviolence. The other supports and endorses violence.

  • MLK said, ”Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon which cuts without wounding and ennobles the man who wields it. It is a sword that heals.”

The MTG path is a dark and dangerous one. The fuel for traveling that path is hate speech and dis- and misinformation.

Put it all together, however, and in this bewildering 21st year of this twenty-first century, it appears that MTG’s path could prevail. Contemplate: The more than 74 million citizens nationwide who voted for Donald Trump to return to the presidency. The tens of million of Americans who believe — or at least accept — the Big Lie that the presidential election was stolen. The insurrectionist mob rioting and storming the U.S. Capitol. The 147 Republican Party members who did not vote to certify the Electoral College presidential results. The Republican Party moving from the party of conservative principles to the party of populist passions. The list could go on and on.

On the other hand, there are reasons to still believe that the MLK path will prevail. Contemplate: The more than 81 million citizens nationwide who voted for Joe Biden and to “fire” Donald Trump. The diverse nature of the new administration and its commitment to the nation’s institutions, social and equal justice, the country’s democratic values, and promoting unity. The 145 Republicans in the House who, when allowed a secret ballot, voted by an overwhelmingly margin to retain Liz Cheney, who had spoken out on the need to impeach Trump, as the House Republican Conference Chair, the third highest position in the party. The ten brave congresspeople who put country before party and voted to impeach Donald Trump. The list could go on and on.

The bad news is that United State of America is actually the divided states of America, and our democracy is at a pivot point. The good news is that we have been there before and we have taken the path forward rather than the path backward.

Where exactly does our democracy stand now? The latest AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll, released in early February, disclosed that a large majority of Americans (more than 80%) still value core democratic principles such as a fair judicial system and the rule of law; individual liberties and freedoms as defined by our constitution; and the ability of people living here to get good jobs and achieve the American dream.

The flip side of the poll is that in terms of how well the U.S. democracy is working: only 16% of respondents said extremely/very well; 38% said somewhat well; and 45% said not too/not well at all. 54% felt America’s best days are ahead of us and 45% felt they are behind us. 36% expect the country to be less divided over the next five years, 33% feel it will become more divided, and, 29% felt it will stay the same.

Not surprisingly, there were large differences of opinion on the performance elements of the democracy by party affiliation. The Democratic respondents were more optimistic and positive in their responses, and the Republican respondents were less so than on the AP-NORC poll conducted in October before this year’s elections.

The bottom line is that our democracy remains fragile and fractured and our people polarized. There is much work that needs to be done to create some sense of togetherness and a shared path forward.

As Pulitzer Prize winning historian, author of the best-selling The Soul of America: The Battle for Our Better Angels, and advisor to President Biden on speeches, Jon Meacham reminds us the country and democracy has been through tough and tumultuous times before and survived because it advanced and overcame its deficiencies rather than succumbing to them.

HBO did a documentary, The Soul of America, featuring Meacham, which ran in December after the election. As reported by Henry Mance of the Financial Times in his article on Meacham and the documentary, Meacham explains:

My argument for years has been that there’s a misimpression that if only we could go back to X, things would be better. So, I always say, where do you want to go back? Name that year. And I can probably without much problem say that if you were a woman, a black person, a low wage worker, you probably wouldn’t go back.

Meacham cautions;

The twin impulses that are worth avoiding are nostalgia for an age that didn’t exist and a kind of narcissism of the present, which suggests that problems — as [historian] Arthur Schlesinger suggests — are uniquely oppressive.

Picking up and building upon Meacham’s observations, MTG’s path backward would be terminal for our American democracy. There is only one path that America can take and that is MLK’s path forward.

As the years since MLK’s tragic death in 1968 have shown, the progress on that path will be slow and not always steady. There will be stumbles and setbacks. At points, the path will have to be rebuilt or built anew.

Because of this, there will be the need for patience and persistence in making the journey. But, we Americans must persevere because that path leads to the mountaintop.

We should remember, as Martin Luther King, Jr. told an overflow crowd of more than 15,000 in Memphis, Tennessee on April 3, 1968, the day before he was assassinated by James Earl Ray;

We’ve got some difficult days ahead. But it really doesn’t matter to me now, because I’ve been to the mountaintop…I’ve seen the Promised Land. I may not get there will you. But I want you to know tonight, that we as a people will get to the Promised Land.

Indeed, we as Americans do have some difficult days ahead. But we can get to that mountain top and the Promised Land, if we discover our better angels and choose the right path to walk and work upon together.

That path is the MLK path. Forward!

Hamid Ansari’s Woes: Plight of Pluralism in India

Hamid Ansari’s Woes: Plight of Pluralism in India

Ram Puniyani

Ram Puniyani

Ram Puniyani

India began as a plural democracy; respect for diversity was the core value. The provisions of safeguards for minorities were in built. These safeguards were formulated by the Constituent Assembly’s committee on Minorities headed by Sardar Patel. Seven decades down the lines where do we stand in matters of security and economic welfare of the religious minorities. Most of the inquiry commission reports related to communal violence, the scholarly works on communal violence by the likes of Paul Brass, Asghar Ali Engineer and recently from Yale University give a very painful picture of the communal violence, showing that the Muslims minorities in particular and lately Christian Minorities have suffered adversely. Sachar Committee Report (2006) showed the economic marginalization of Muslim minorities.

The events of last few decades and more so of last six years show the rising intimidation, marginalization and increasing fear among this community. The lynchings in the name of cow-beef and the harassment around love jihad have brought to fore the type of problems our country is facing on the scale of democratic freedoms. This was most clearly demonstrated when the large section of media with full support of the ruling dispensation coined the terms  like ‘Corona bomb’ and ‘Corona Jihad’ in the wake  of rise of Covid. To add salt to the wound, the present Government initiated NRC in Assam on the grounds that over 50 Lakh Bangladeshi’s have infiltrated into India particularly in Assam. When the final count came only 19 odd lakh people were found without proper citizenship papers out of which 12.5 Lakhs were Hindus!

Undeterred by this the ruling Government brought in Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in which the persecuted communities in neighboring countries are entitled for citizenship barring the Muslims. The trap was clear that those people who were without papers and were Hindus will get the citizenship through the back door while millions of Muslims without proper papers will be disenfranchised from citizenship to be shunted to detention centers.

It was in this background that our ex-Vice President Hamdi Ansari wrote his memoirs “By a Many Happy Accident: Recollections of a Life”. In discussions and interviews by different channels around the release of the book he voiced some of the concerns. He tried to emphasize that our citizenship is not based on religion. As most of the comments on his book and also on his life revolved around his being a Muslim, he underlined the fact that in his diplomatic and political life Muslim ness did not matter, what mattered was professional competence. As such this sums up his career which spanned over four decades and served the country in a very honorable way.

That apart the communal elements constantly targeted him for his being Muslim. In one of the republic day parade (2015), when army saluted as Jan Gan Man, national anthem was sung. A picture was circulated to create misconception that Ansari did not salute when the anthem was being sung. In this picture President is seen saluting along with him Prime Minster Narendra Modi and defense Minster are also saluting. Ansari stands still and picture highlights his not saluting. The criticism of his not saluting tricolor was propagated. At such an occasion only President, who is Commander-in-Chief of army salutes. No one is supposed to salute at that time. What Ansari did was as per the protocol, while those who saluted with President did not follow the guidelines laid down!

When Ansari retired in his farewell speech the Prime Minster took a dig. “. “A big part of your working life was in West Asia… in the same atmosphere and debate… after retirement, it was minority’s commission or AMU… that was your circumference,”

In the response to release of his book the communal forces again are uttering that India gave you so many top positions and your are disgruntled! You can very well leave the country and stay in the one where you feel at home. These types of comments show the mindset of the sectarian nationalists who see the citizens only in their religion’s identity. Ansari is not talking of his personal unhappiness. Being a thorough democrat and Indian nationalist, he is trying to draw our attention to declining ethos of our country. Since the identity issues, the emotive issues like Ram Temple, Cow-beef, Ghar Wapasi and Love jihad have taken the front stage our democratic foundations are being eroded to no end.

Similarly he points that with current Government the word secularism has gone into eclipse, it has disappeared from Governments dictionary. One can argue that even earlier the practice of secularism was on a weak wicket, e.g. the responses to Shah Bano Judgment did go contra to the values of secularism. Numerous reasons can be attributed to the weakness in practice of secularism. Still at most levels it had honorable place. What was missing was the astute sense of implementing it in the complex scenario where intense propaganda against protective clauses for minorities was projected as ‘minority appeasement’. Now there is not even an iota of consideration that as a secular state Prime Minster should not inaugurate a religious place of worship or issues like violence in the name Cow-Beef should not enjoy impunity. There is not even smallest consideration that in CAA how we can bar granting of citizenship to people of particular religion.

Ansari points out, “Overall, the very fact that Indian-ness of any citizen being questioned is a disturbing thought,’ and “enhanced apprehensions of insecurity amongst segments of our citizen body, particularly Dalits, Muslims and Christians” and the “illiberal form of nationalism that promotes intolerance”.

The critics of pluralism and diversity assert that what is prevailing is the genuine secularism as it has balanced the earlier tilt towards minorities. They also try to equate few other killings as lynching’s, to show that there no insecurity for dalits and minorities as such. Ansari’s observations need to be taken seriously and course correction of our democracy needs to be undertaken.

Muslims urged to be in forefront to work for betterment of society

Muslims urged to be in forefront to work for betterment of society

Ms Anita, Founder of Damini NGO working for the empowerment of women, addressing

Ms Anita, Founder of Damini NGO working for the empowerment of women, addressing

JIH’s Nationwide Campaign ‘Strong Family, Strong Society’ begins

By Pervez Bari 

BHOPAL: Dr. Hamid Beg, State president, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JIH), Madhya Pradesh zone has stressed that the responsibility of betterment situation of the society lies on every citizen of this country and Muslims should be in the forefront to carry out this responsibility. All citizens should focus on this issue and therefore, support this campaign, carry its message to each household and make the campaign a grand success.

Dr. Beg made the above observation in his presidential address in the inaugural programme as part of the Nationwide Campaign, “Strong Family, Strong Society”. The function was organized here on Friday, 19th February, at Hameed Manzil, Bhopal by the Women Wing’s of JIH, MP zone.

Ms Anita, Founder of Damini NGO working for the empowerment of women, addressing the assemblage on the occasion called upon women folk to realise their responsibility of building a strong family and thereby a strong society. Realising their responsibility the womenfolk should leave no stone unturned to achieve their goal. A woman’s role in her home where she looks after the needs of every household is more important than the duty of a District Collector, she added.

Ms Aruna, a retired resource person of Azeem Premji Foundation, expressing her views on the occasion said that for laying the foundation of a strong family it is very necessary that there should be mutual love and respect amongst the family members.

Presently working as a member of Akhil Bharatiya Janseva Mahila Sangathan, Ms Aruna said Womenfolk should realise their strength as they are in no way inferior to men. They should perform their duties with utmost dedication. Both men and women are at par with each other. It is only the division of labour which the Creator has assigned us, she added.

The programme started with recitation of verses from the Holy Qur’an by Mrs. Zakirah.

Meanwhile, in the inaugural address, after a brief introduction of JIH, Ms. Rafiya Sultan, MP convenor of the nationwide campaign, highlighted the need of this campaign in the wake of an increase in the number of domestic violence incidents during the lockdown period, which forced the nation to understand and accept the fact that how fragile our family system has become.

Mrs. Asifah Yaseen speaking on the occasion said that Western culture is being followed in the households while the fact is that the situation of women in the West itself is very painful.

Thereafter, Mrs. Mumtaz shed light on various ways to create awareness and improve the situation of the society.

State Secretary of JIH, Women’s Wing, MP zone, presented a detailed introduction of the ‘Strong Family Strong Society’ Campaign.

From Kashmir to Kanyakumari, farmers’ agitation has brought a new ray of hope against injustice: Maulana Sajjad Nomani

From Kashmir to Kanyakumari, farmers’ agitation has brought a new ray of hope against injustice: Maulana Sajjad Nomani

Maulana Sajjad Nomani

Maulana Sajjad Nomani

He said the Muslims of this country were standing behind the farmers in their fight

New Delhi: All India Muslim Personal Law Board spokesperson Maulana Sajjad Nomani farmers’ agitation has brought a new ray of hope against injustice. Addressing farmers at Singhu border, he added that Indian Muslims were standing behind them in this struggle.

“So many organisations have been, for years, trying to create awareness about the injustices in the country, and this movement has brought a new ray of hope from Kashmir to Kanyakumari.

“Thanks to you and your leadership, who realised that ‘enough is enough’ and decided to raise your voices, we have been reassured that the era of darkness in the country is ending and that justice is not very far away,” Nomani said.

Nomani has regularly been extending his support to the agitation through his YouTube channel since the commencement of protests in November in 2020.

“On behalf of the Muslim society, I assure you that we are all standing behind you and support you, and request you to not lose hope and continue this fight,” he added.

“It is because of your strength that God has chosen you to lead this movement,” he said.

He further urged the protestors not to allow outside forces to disrupt their agitation. “There is a conspiracy to divide this movement, but we should all remain united, because India is a country of love and brotherhood,” Nomani said.

Turkey to establish industrial zone in West Bank

Turkey to establish industrial zone in West Bank

TurkeyMove tipped to provide 5,000 direct and 15,000 indirect jobs

Ramallah, Palestine: The Palestinian government has welcomed Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s decision to establish an industrial zone in the West Bank city of Jenin.

Speaking to Anadolu Agency, Palestinian Economy Minister Khaled Al-Osaily said the Turkish support amounts to $10 million and is meant for the internal structure of the industrial zone.

“There is a plan for Turkish factories to operate in the [industrial] zone,” Al-Osaily said.

According to the Palestinian minister, the industrial zone will be implemented in two phases: The first is financed by Germany at a cost of about 24 million euros, and includes all external infrastructure and is likely to be completed by mid-2021.

The second phase, which targets the internal infrastructure, is financed by Turkey and will cost about $10 million. It is expected to be ready soon.

On Saturday, the Turkish Official Gazette published a decision by Erdogan to permit the Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey (TOBB) to establish an industrial zone in Jenin.

Al-Osaily extended his thanks to the Turkish president, government and people “for their political stances and for supporting the Palestinian economy”.

Expressing hope that the presence of Turkish factories will boost Palestinian exports, Al-Osaily also expects the creation of about 5,000 direct job opportunities and 15,000 indirect jobs in the process.

The idea of ​​establishing a free industrial zone in Jenin began in 1999 but stalled several times before it was practically started last year.

The planned industrial zone extends over 1,100 dunams (a dunam equals 1,000 square meters), and is located about three kilometers north of Jenin’s city center.

Food factories, textile factories and factories for car installation will be built on it.