Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

‘Voice of oppressed not meant to be criminalised’: Court quashes FIR against Pa. Ranjith

by | Dec 1, 2021

The Madras High Court has quashed criminal proceedings initiated against filmmaker Pa. Ranjith for his statement on the Chola era during a public event in 2019.

“Voice of the oppressed is not meant to be oppressed or criminalised. But to be listened, discussed, addressed and remedied,” the court observed.

Pa. Ranjith has not exceeded the limit to freedom of speech under Article 19 (1)(a) of the Constitution, observed the Madurai Bench of court.

The filmmaker’s criticism meted upon the Chola Kingdom, according to the court, was based on historical books.

While attending a program organised by Neelapulligal Movement Association in June 2019, award winning director Pa. Ranjith stated that the caste system was introduced by King Raja Raja Chola. Chola era was a dark one, that resulted in a large number of the population becoming landless poor, he said.

Soon after the speech, a suo moto FIR registered in Thirupananthal Police Station for offences under Sections 153 (wantonly giving provocation with intent to cause riot) and 153-A(i)(a) IPC (promoting enmity between different groups by words on the ground of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony).

Ranjith was granted anticipatory bail by the court in the case.

“By going through the History of Chola era as found in the stones, inscriptions, copper plates etc, views have been made by historians that casteism was prevailing during Chola era. Police cannot take action against those historians for having made such comments. The main purpose of the history is to take lessons from the society of yesteryears for reforming the present-day society”, the court recorded,” Live Law quoted Justice G. Ilangovan as saying while quashing the FIR.

The Madras High Court also quoted Dr BR Ambedkar to explain the meaning of “fraternity” and the antithesis, i.e., caste system, in the context of the constitution and oppressed classes, the legal website reported.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

M.A. Saleem Takes charges as Karnataka’s Top Cop

M.A. Saleem Takes charges as Karnataka’s Top Cop

BENGALURU, May 28, 2025 — M.A. Saleem, a seasoned IPS officer with over three decades of service, has been appointed Karnataka’s Director General & Inspector General of Police (DGIGP), succeeding Alok Mohan, the state’s longest-serving IPS officer, who retired...

Miss England Milla Magee Quits Miss World 2025

Miss England Milla Magee Quits Miss World 2025

Hyderabad: Milla Magee, the stunning representative of England at the Miss World 2025 pageant, shocked the audience by announcing her withdrawal from the competition. In a tearful press conference, Magee revealed that she felt pressured to compromise her values and...

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *