NewsWorld

Moody’s downgrades Bangladesh’s ratings despite stable outlook

Global credit rating agency, Moody's Investors Service has downgraded Bangladesh's long-term issuer and senior unsecured ratings from Ba3 to B1 and reaffirmed short-term issuer ratings at "Not Prime".

Dhaka, May 31,2023:  Global credit rating agency, Moody’s Investors Service has downgraded Bangladesh’s long-term issuer and senior unsecured ratings from Ba3 to B1 and reaffirmed short-term issuer ratings at “Not Prime”.

Moody’s disclosed the downgraded rating following a review initiated on December 9, 2022, reports Xinhua news agency.

“The rating outlook is stable,” the credit rating agency said.

Moody’s assessment read that Bangladesh’s heightened external vulnerability and liquidity risks were persistent, and together with institutional weaknesses uncovered during the ongoing crisis, the sovereign’s credit profile is consistent with a B1 rating.

Despite some easing, ongoing dollar scarcity and deterioration in foreign exchange reserves indicate continued pressures on Bangladesh’s external position, exacerbating import constraints and, as a result, energy shortages.

A low level of fiscal revenues relative to the size of the economy constrains the government’s policy choices and points to weaken debt affordability as higher interest payments result from the taka’s devaluation and short maturities for domestic debt.

Although Moody’s expects external financing to help alleviate pressures on the external and fiscal metrics, external buffers will remain weaker than before the pandemic and higher debt levels will weaken fiscal strength, particularly as Moody’s expects fiscal reforms will take years to materialize.

Bangladesh’s local currency (LC) and foreign currency (FC) ceilings have concurrently been lowered to Ba2 and B1 from Ba1 and Ba3, respectively.

The LC ceiling is placed two notches above the sovereign rating, reflecting weak predictability and reliability of government institutions and high external imbalances, which raise risks for the garment export sector’s contributions to government revenue, balanced by a relatively small government footprint.

The FC ceiling is placed two notches below the LC ceiling, reflecting low capital account openness, weak policy effectiveness, and some degree of unpredictability surrounding capital flow management, but also taking into account a low external indebtedness.

 

Related Articles

Back to top button